Quite clearly
there were multiple reasons why the British people voted to leave the EU in
2016. It would be wrong to suggest that 17.4mn all had exactly the same reason
for wanting to put an end to the UK’s 40 year relationship. But what we can say
is that if that relationship was working and had produced benefits, there would
have been no referendum movement in the first place.
Contrast the EU
with the NHS. The NHS came into being in 1946. The NHS is far from perfect. It
is not held in in high regard - indeed from the start it has attracted
criticism. But, aside from sporadic calls for its abolition, and despite its many
failings people have accepted it. There has never been any suggestion that we
should have a referendum on whether or not to abolish it. Why is that? Because,
give or take, the NHS works. The EU, on the other hand, has had 40 years to
convince the British people of the benefits of EU membership and yet, from the
outset it has singularly failed to achieve widespread popular support among the
ordinary people of this country. It is hard to imagine that any anti-EU
movement would have gained any traction if the people’s perception and
experience of the EU was overwhelmingly positive. Had the experience of the
last 40 years been positive, the result on 23 June 2016 would have been
overwhelmingly in favour of remaining in the EU – or rather there would never
have been any call to hold the referendum in the first place. The fact is that
our collective experience of the EU has not been positive. Worse than that, rather
than improving over time it has deteriorated to the point that by June 2016 the
majority of voters, despite all the risks, were prepared to reject it. - Blind Stoat 31 March 2018
Comments
Post a Comment